Constitionality of mandating flu shots

Spreading the flu virus in a hospital presents unique patient care risks.

Patients with long-term and chronic medical conditions risk serious complications from the flu.

The warnings of dangerous side effects propagated by the attention-grabbing anti-vaccination movement do nothing to further the cause of mandatory vaccines.

MORE: Why the Anti-Vaccine Crowd Won’t Fade Away Health officials have begun to latch onto the idea, says Zucker.

So many California children were not fully vaccinated, especially when they were clustered in certain areas of the state, lead to several outbreaks of measles, whooping cough and other infectious diseases.But mandatory influenza vaccination hasn't caught on as fast, even though vaccination for young children is strongly recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.The constantly evolving nature of the flu and its less-than-perfect effectiveness are among the reasons why the requirement hasn't taken root, says University of California San Francisco medical professor Barbara Koenig.In 2009, concerns about a swine flu pandemic convinced some employers to consider requiring employees to be vaccinated.Now that we are in the midst of another flu epidemic, some employers are once again weighing the costs and benefits of a mandatory flu shot policy.

Search for constitionality of mandating flu shots:

constitionality of mandating flu shots-73

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “constitionality of mandating flu shots”